Draft Atlanta Hawks Pick-Swap Watch Thread

Will the 2026 Hawks Swap Convey?

  • Yes

  • No

Results are only viewable after voting.
1kangaroo said:
The question is who will most likely be available in the 10-12th range that can shot the 3 ball and play defense at SF or PF
Click to expand...
Nate Ament: Plays like Cam Johnson. But I think this archetype is not something you pursue with a pick that high because chances are, Champagnie will still be better than them.

Hannes Steinbach: Imagine Brook Lopez next to Vic. However, the Spurs are showing no signs of wanting to have a full time twin tower setup as evidenced by Kornet not playing with Vic much.

Yaxel Lendeborg: plays like Jerami Grant. Problem here is I’m skeptical of him buying in the team concept and making good shot decisions. Imagine Barnes repeatedly shooting even when he’s cold. I think he would be a bonehead on this team.

Thomas Haugh: plays like a slightly quicker Zach Collins. Again, I have a problem seeing anyone beat out Champagnie (or Barnes for that matter) if all they have to bring is a 3 pt shot and nothing else. I also consider anyone who is not accustomed to dribbling the ball a minus for the team.

Karim Lopez - I think this would be like signing Trey Lyles to our team and we saw how that went. If you can sign Trey Lyles, why not just do that instead of wasting a pick on a similar version of him?

Joshua Jefferson: now this is my current favorite. We’re talking about the Spurs are back at the top lately, why not bring more nostalgia? This would be like adding Boris Diaw to the mix. It would be Showtime Spurs.
 
OK Computer said:
Nate Ament: Plays like Cam Johnson. But I think this archetype is not something you pursue with a pick that high because chances are, Champagnie will still be better than them.

Hannes Steinbach: Imagine Brook Lopez next to Vic. However, the Spurs are showing no signs of wanting to have a full time twin tower setup as evidenced by Kornet not playing with Vic much.

Yaxel Lendeborg: plays like Jerami Grant. Problem here is I’m skeptical of him buying in the team concept and making good shot decisions. Imagine Barnes repeatedly shooting even when he’s cold. I think he would be a bonehead on this team.

Thomas Haugh: plays like a slightly quicker Zach Collins. Again, I have a problem seeing anyone beat out Champagnie (or Barnes for that matter) if all they have to bring is a 3 pt shot and nothing else. I also consider anyone who is not accustomed to dribbling the ball a minus for the team.

Karim Lopez - I think this would be like signing Trey Lyles to our team and we saw how that went. If you can sign Trey Lyles, why not just do that instead of wasting a pick on a similar version of him?

Joshua Jefferson: now this is my current favorite. We’re talking about the Spurs are back at the top lately, why not bring more nostalgia? This would be like adding Boris Diaw to the mix. It would be Showtime Spurs.
Click to expand...
I really don't get the Hannes Steinbach - Brook Lopez comparison. (with me being german) Is it just the hairstyles?
 
OK Computer said:
Nate Ament: Plays like Cam Johnson. But I think this archetype is not something you pursue with a pick that high because chances are, Champagnie will still be better than them.

Hannes Steinbach: Imagine Brook Lopez next to Vic. However, the Spurs are showing no signs of wanting to have a full time twin tower setup as evidenced by Kornet not playing with Vic much.

Yaxel Lendeborg: plays like Jerami Grant. Problem here is I’m skeptical of him buying in the team concept and making good shot decisions. Imagine Barnes repeatedly shooting even when he’s cold. I think he would be a bonehead on this team.

Thomas Haugh: plays like a slightly quicker Zach Collins. Again, I have a problem seeing anyone beat out Champagnie (or Barnes for that matter) if all they have to bring is a 3 pt shot and nothing else. I also consider anyone who is not accustomed to dribbling the ball a minus for the team.

Karim Lopez - I think this would be like signing Trey Lyles to our team and we saw how that went. If you can sign Trey Lyles, why not just do that instead of wasting a pick on a similar version of him?

Joshua Jefferson: now this is my current favorite. We’re talking about the Spurs are back at the top lately, why not bring more nostalgia? This would be like adding Boris Diaw to the mix. It would be Showtime Spurs.
Click to expand...
I don't have any thoughts on these guys, so I'm just going with your comps and descriptions above...

But if that is accurate, I could see a case for Steinbach similar to the case for drafting Sorber in OKC. Just as Sorber is an eventual replacement for iHart, perhaps Hannes could be drafted as an eventual Luke replacement. Seems kind of rich though, since I imagine you can get similar prospects in the second round (maybe a safe bet, considering you could get Kalkbrenner and Reynaud in the second round last year).
 
OK Computer said:
Nate Ament: Plays like Cam Johnson. But I think this archetype is not something you pursue with a pick that high because chances are, Champagnie will still be better than them.

Hannes Steinbach: Imagine Brook Lopez next to Vic. However, the Spurs are showing no signs of wanting to have a full time twin tower setup as evidenced by Kornet not playing with Vic much.

Yaxel Lendeborg: plays like Jerami Grant. Problem here is I’m skeptical of him buying in the team concept and making good shot decisions. Imagine Barnes repeatedly shooting even when he’s cold. I think he would be a bonehead on this team.

Thomas Haugh: plays like a slightly quicker Zach Collins. Again, I have a problem seeing anyone beat out Champagnie (or Barnes for that matter) if all they have to bring is a 3 pt shot and nothing else. I also consider anyone who is not accustomed to dribbling the ball a minus for the team.

Karim Lopez - I think this would be like signing Trey Lyles to our team and we saw how that went. If you can sign Trey Lyles, why not just do that instead of wasting a pick on a similar version of him?

Joshua Jefferson: now this is my current favorite. We’re talking about the Spurs are back at the top lately, why not bring more nostalgia? This would be like adding Boris Diaw to the mix. It would be Showtime Spurs.
Click to expand...
I think the question has to be asked if we are looking for a starter in that range or not? We are unlikely to find one at that point, but we may be choosing between a bench guy who has a longterm ceiling as a starter and a guy who can play significant bench minutes day one.
 
mudyez said:
I really don't get the Hannes Steinbach - Brook Lopez comparison. (with me being german) Is it just the hairstyles?
Click to expand...
Tall, big body, effective in the paint, rebounds, shoots some 3’s.

There are really only three types of bigs in the NBA.

Group 1: Big body, almost unmoveable, covers a lot of space like Steven Adams, Kornet, Brook Lopez, Zubac… sometimes these guys can shoot.

group 2: Tall, skinny, a little bit more agile, roams a little bit more, can be pushed aside by group 1. Usually not good interior defenders. May have some long range game. Typically called unicorns. Claxton, Sengun, Kalel Ware, Holmgreen.

Group 3: garbage men bigs. Doesn’t have an interior presence. Does the dirty work. Typically undersized. Daniel Gafford, Adebayo, Luke Garza

I think Hannes fits group 1.
 
scott said:
I don't have any thoughts on these guys, so I'm just going with your comps and descriptions above...

But if that is accurate, I could see a case for Steinbach similar to the case for drafting Sorber in OKC. Just as Sorber is an eventual replacement for iHart, perhaps Hannes could be drafted as an eventual Luke replacement. Seems kind of rich though, since I imagine you can get similar prospects in the second round (maybe a safe bet, considering you could get Kalkbrenner and Reynaud in the second round last year).
Click to expand...
Agreed. That’s why I want unique talent with the first round pick. Something you can’t get in the second. As I mentioned with shooter archetypes (like Nate Ament and Karim Lopez), applies to center prospects as well. I really think about if they will beat any current player (like Champagnie) out of the rotation first. And the path to beating Champagnie is not being a better shooter, it’s being a unique talent and being able to do more than shoot. That’s why I like JJ.
 
Ok computer are you out on Tounde? Or do you think hes not on our range?
 
mo7888 said:
I think the question has to be asked if we are looking for a starter in that range or not? We are unlikely to find one at that point, but we may be choosing between a bench guy who has a longterm ceiling as a starter and a guy who can play significant bench minutes day one.
Click to expand...
You’re right, I don’t think there’s an immediate starter to be found. So who is beating Barnes out of his bench position as bad as Barnes is trending? I still think it’s someone whose skillset is more than shooting. We need to form a dynamic forward trio just as we have done with our dynamic guard trio. Steph, Harper, Fox all bring something different to the table. Who is the third we’re adding to CB and Champagnie? Surely, not another version of them…
 
100%Duncan said:
Ok computer are you out on Tounde? Or do you think hes not on our range?
Click to expand...
Nah, I’m in on Tounde - I’m just playing the game others are playing if the Spurs do go for size in the upcoming draft … of which I’m not entirely convinced - i think they go for talent over fit 9 times out of 10.

As of now, i would be extremely happy to draft either Tounde or Joshua Jefferson. If someone else catches my eye, that list might grow… i’ve only really watched film of guys projected in the first round. Braylon Mullins is actually another kid that I think would be nice.
 
OK Computer said:
You’re right, I don’t think there’s an immediate starter to be found. So who is beating Barnes out of his bench position as bad as Barnes is trending? I still think it’s someone whose skillset is more than shooting. We need to form a dynamic forward trio just as we have done with our dynamic guard trio. Steph, Harper, Fox all bring something different to the table. Who is the third we’re adding to CB and Champagnie? Surely, not another version of them…
Click to expand...
I agree we'd like someone who brings more than shooting as long as shooting is part of the package. I'm even willing to fudge a little on shooting if ft% and/or good shooting form is part of the package.

I'm open to the 2, 3, 4, or 5 positions if the player has the right 'mix.'
 
Bucks about to pull off a double win for us. Milwaukee won't be catching anyone in the tank off. So Giannis won't shutdown for the season when they have realistic chance at 7th seed with 29 games left including 2 games vs Atlanta & 2 games vs Miami.
 
Last edited:
Bucks have to go for it, right? Doubt Giannis pack it in with 29 games left (Including 2X vs ATL and 2X. vs Miami) and a real shot at getting as high as 8th seed

Screenshot_13-2-2026_43054_www.espn.com.webpScreenshot_13-2-2026_43228_www.tankathon.com.webp
 
Giannis won’t pack it in, so they just have to stay afloat until his return. As long as they are within range of a playoff spot i expect Giannis to continue being a 100% effort guy as long as he’s out there
 
spurraider21 said:
Giannis won’t pack it in, so they just have to stay afloat until his return. As long as they are within range of a playoff spot i expect Giannis to continue being a 100% effort guy as long as he’s out there
Click to expand...
I just want Atlanta to get dumped straight into lottery; i don't want to go through the stress of two play-in games like last season. What's at stake is relatively important as this is likely going to be the highest draft pick the Spurs will receive until maybe the Kings swap in 2031, and it comes in a strong draft class..
 
spursistan said:
I just want Atlanta to get dumped straight into lottery; i don't want to go through the stress of two play-in games like last season. What's at stake is relatively important as this is likely going to be the highest draft pick the Spurs will receive until maybe the Kings swap in 2031, and it comes in a strong draft class..
Click to expand...
Of course. But last year ATL was #8 so they had 2 shots during the play-in. If they are 9 or 10 they’d have to go 2 for 2 in play-in games to advance.

But if we want them out of the play-in altogether Milwaukee is our last hope since the bulls are collapsing
 
Read some update that Embiid may not play vs. Hawks - hope they still have enough of a roster to beat them. What's that Master Bag Getter, Paul George, even up to these days? Haven't heard his name in months :st-lol:
 
yep, Embiid confirmed out for the game despite coming off the all star break. hasnt played since 2/7
 
Sugus said:
Read some update that Embiid may not play vs. Hawks - hope they still have enough of a roster to beat them. What's that Master Bag Getter, Paul George, even up to these days? Haven't heard his name in months :st-lol:
Click to expand...
Pual George was suspended for taking "improper medication" at the end of January.

Paul George suspended 25 games

Paul George suspended 25 games
www.hoopshype.com www.hoopshype.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

LeBowen
Analysis Spurs draft assets, cap situation and future projections
2 3 4
Replies
92
Views
4K
DTW
D
Limguoguolo
The Wemby Block Challenge 2.0
Replies
9
Views
416
Limguoguolo
Limguoguolo
Guru of Nothing
Spurs Third-String Center Discussion
3 4 5
Replies
124
Views
3K
LeBowen
LeBowen
BatManu20
Game Thread Spurs (29-13) vs Jazz (14-28) (Mon 1/19/26) [4:00PM CDT]
17 18 19
Replies
471
Views
6K
Shmurs
S
scott
Trade Spurs Trade Ideas
127 128 129
Replies
3K
Views
71K
rascal
rascal
Back
Top