The Garnet revisionist history, on a spurs forum of all places, is hilarious.
KG was soft. He had a soft game and soft mentality. That’s why he postured like a tough guy and picked on white euros like all nba fake tough guys do. He had no success until he was placed on a super team and found his true role in the NBA: a high level role player.
Anybody calling KG tough?
About shot blocking I was just responding at your post where you gave stats about his career block numbers, it was part of the overall discussion of me saying I don't see Victor as KG 2.0.
Got it. To clarify, KG 2.0 means Wemby can improve upon everything Garnett did, not that he is like Garnett.
As for Jokic I specifically talk about offensive game. On defense I feel Victor does not need a lot of coaching, just the famous how to continue high level defense while preserving stamina for the offense. Besides we have Tim around if needed on this aspect of the game.
I am not sure if Tim's defence is what Wemby should be picking up, even though a point (great point too) could be made that great positioning and the cerebral aspect of Duncan's defence is timeline, and that is why I brought up Garnett. Garnett's combination of post and perimeter defence, often transitioning between both in the same possession, is something that not only Wemby is suited for, but also something that works well in today's league. I felt the Admiral, with his speed and length, is someone Wemby can emulate defensively, but Robinson didn't (likely because he didn't have to) play much perimeter defence back in those days.
As for your conclusion I do agree and I get your point. For me he has progressed a lot but he has still to improve on offense: punish teams that chose to go small on him, punish teams sending double/triple on him (eventhough it seems Victor starts to manage it better) and his passing/playmaking (aspects where I did not see much progress compared to year 1 Victor), and for that no better game to emulate than Jokic.
Wemby's offence is definitely a work in progress, and much of that is decision making. He sometimes settles, he sometimes would grow impatient, he sometimes would take the flashy move instead of the simple move. For me, his play-making is a matter of reading double teams especially on drives around the high post areas. Garnett wasn't particularly outstanding in this low post, but he was an incredible shot creator and passer in the mid-range, high post and on drives for a big, which is something Wemby can learn from. What I would like Wemby to do is excel in that 10-18 feet area, either back to the basket on high posts, face ups shots, or quick drives. He would be absolutely lethal, especially when he can combine it with his outside shooting and offensive rebounding.
I am not sure what Wemby's full potential could be. I don't have to worry about him pulling a Shaq because of his laziness and never fully fulfililng his destiny to be the GOAT, but more like a Robinson, where he just worked on and was being ask for, the wrong stuff, stiffling his strengths and leading him to never reaching his true potential. Well ... or Ralph Sampson.