I'm 50/50 on the rule. It has its positives and negatives. The league has for whatever reason to many healthy players sitting out games. At a time when theyre making a ridiculous amount of money per season it just a bad look and hurts the fans who pay big bucks to see them play. The rule helps in that regard. On the other side it also makes players who should probably take time off for a injury try to play to meet the quota risking further injury. I've always said if you're healthy enough to play you play if you're not you sit. There is no reason for healthy players to be sitting as there is no reason for injured players to be playing. And I mean a real injury. Something that could get worse if you risk it, not some little boo boo. Maybe they should add some more exceptions to the rule. Injuries are part of the game and I think Silver should understand that. If a player gets a serious injury or break something they shouldn't be penalized for not playing because they physically can't. Maybe in those scenarios you can count the miss games differently. For example if you miss 3 weeks, 10 games it only counts for 5 games because of the severity of the injury. I don't think sitting players for rest should happen though. I mean at the end of the day most players are playing like 30 minutes a game. Thats not really a lot in my opinion. We are talking about some of the most fit, athletic people alive. On back to backs just let them play the minimum if they really need the rest that bad.