Player The Refurbished Budget Wine Cellar of Julian Champagnie

Is there a maximum amount that a contract can be frontloaded? With his continued development and his valuable archetype, I'm starting to wonder whether it might be a better idea just to frontload the shit out of his new contract next year while the Spurs still have cap room rather than try and get an expensive free agent who might not get playing time with the roster sort of locked in for next year.
 
Is there a maximum amount that a contract can be frontloaded? With his continued development and his valuable archetype, I'm starting to wonder whether it might be a better idea just to frontload the shit out of his new contract next year while the Spurs still have cap room rather than try and get an expensive free agent who might not get playing time with the roster sort of locked in for next year.
We talked about it many times already. Decline his option and get his frontloaded extension started early while we don't have cap issues.
I think 8% is the number.
As in the salary can't be lowered by more than 8% from the first year salary in each subsequent year.
100%-92%-84%-76% of the 1st year salary for a 4 year contract.

Champ has probably played himself into that $13M to $16M range.
But he also hasn't made any serious money and I think his priority is to secure the bag. And he said multiple times he'd like to stay.

Something like $50M/4 frontloaded deal seems fair.
$14-13-12-11M per year sounds fair considering his improved consistency and rebounding ability.


He got the permanent starting role exactly 30 games ago.
13/6, 42% from 3pt on 7 attempts.
 
Last edited:
I think you chuck quite a bit more money at him than that - the projected MLE is $15.1M ...


I figure that between Champ and Barnes, there's about $22-23 million tied up (~19M to Barnes and ~3M to Champ, this year). I'd be try to get both of them in that $22M space next year. Champ on $19M -17.5 - 16 - 14.5, and Barnes on $3M - 3 - 3 (team option).
 
We talked about it many times already. Decline his option and get his frontloaded extension started early while we don't have cap issues.
I think 8% is the number.
As in the salary can't be lowered by more than 8% from the first year salary in each subsequent year.
100%-92%-84%-76% of the 1st year salary for a 4 year contract.

Champ has probably played himself into that $13M to $16M range.
But he also hasn't made any serious money and I think his priority is to secure the bag. And he said multiple times he'd like to stay.

Something like $50M/4 frontloaded deal seems fair.
$14-13-12-11M per year sounds fair considering his improved consistency and rebounding ability.


He got the permanent starting role exactly 30 games ago.
13/6, 42% from 3pt on 7 attempts.

I think he'll probably push for a 3 year so he can hit the market during his absolute prime years. But the above is in line with Isiaha Joe's deal which is fair value for him, maybe a slight raise. Something like 42mil over 3 years frontloaded.
 
I think he'll probably push for a 3 year so he can hit the market during his absolute prime years. But the above is in line with Isiaha Joe's deal which is fair value for him, maybe a slight raise. Something like 42mil over 3 years frontloaded.
I guess we'll have to wait and see. I'm hoping for a 4 year deal since he said he really wants to stay and compete with these guys.
Since you mention Joe, it's hillarious that both of them were cut by the Sixers. :st-lol:
 
Another really good game from Champagnie last night against the Rockets. Shot the ball well, rebounded and defended adequately and even threw in 4 assists without turning the ball over once.
 
This was interesting:

“As Gozlan writes, the maximum the 24-year-old could receive on an extension would be $87MM over four years. Gozlan suggests a four-year deal in the $75-76MM range could be a reasonable compromise for both sides.”

 
This was interesting:

“As Gozlan writes, the maximum the 24-year-old could receive on an extension would be $87MM over four years. Gozlan suggests a four-year deal in the $75-76MM range could be a reasonable compromise for both sides.”

So, around 19 millions per year. I have no idea what % of the cap that would be, but it sounds expensive. If we want to pay all of Wemby, Harper and Castle, I don't know how much we can afford to pay the role players. I'm sure the Front Office already did the math, projecting the max to our guys in rookie contracts. Finding cheap role players is the key in this new NBA, tbh.
 
I did some research and apparently the cap is at around 155 millions.

-Wemby is expected to make around 50 to 60 millions per year.

-I don't know about Castle and Harper but I suppose it will be around 40 to 50.

So, resigning all those 3 guys would already have us fucked. :st-lol: Somebody that knows more about these things, please tell me if I'm right or way off.
 
I did some research and apparently the cap is at around 155 millions.

-Wemby is expected to make around 50 to 60 millions per year.

-I don't know about Castle and Harper but I suppose it will be around 40 to 50.

So, resigning all those 3 guys would already have us fucked. :st-lol: Somebody that knows more about these things, please tell me if I'm right or way off.
you need to be looking at the luxury tax, not salary cap. Next year the luxury tax is project to be around $200m with ~9% increases each year. So while keeping Fox is probably unlikely past 27-28 season, otherwise it will be manageable if Castle/Harper average $45m/year.

OKC is a team that has problems next year, no way they can bring back Hartenstein/Dort/Kenrich Williams (all have team options) without blowing through the 2nd apron and paying 1/2 a billion in tax
 
you need to be looking at the luxury tax, not salary cap. Next year the luxury tax is project to be around $200m with ~9% increases each year. So while keeping Fox is probably unlikely past 27-28 season, otherwise it will be manageable if Castle/Harper average $45m/year.

OKC is a team that has problems next year, no way they can bring back Hartenstein/Dort/Kenrich Williams (all have team options) without blowing through the 2nd apron and paying 1/2 a billion in tax
If the top is 200, with Wemby at 60 and Castle/Harper combined at 90, that leaves you with 50 millions to fill out the rest of the roster. No way you can pay Champ 19 millions per year under that scenario.

It really seems like this new CBA makes you choose between 2 max guys and decent role players, or 3 max guys and a bunch of rookies/vet minimum players.
 
19mil/year would likely be too rich for Champ. If he can get that in the open market then good for him (it's definitely possible) tbh.
 
If the top is 200, with Wemby at 60 and Castle/Harper combined at 90, that leaves you with 50 millions to fill out the rest of the roster. No way you can pay Champ 19 millions per year under that scenario.

It really seems like this new CBA makes you choose between 2 max guys and decent role players, or 3 max guys and a bunch of rookies/vet minimum players.
It increases 9% per year, so in 27-28 it will be around 220, then around 240 the next season, etc. Wemby won't start his max until 27-28, Castle the next year, Harper the year after when it will be at least 260. CBA expires after the 2030 season, so impossible to say where we'll be by then
 
I did some research and apparently the cap is at around 155 millions.

-Wemby is expected to make around 50 to 60 millions per year.

-I don't know about Castle and Harper but I suppose it will be around 40 to 50.

So, resigning all those 3 guys would already have us fucked. :st-lol: Somebody that knows more about these things, please tell me if I'm right or way off.
You’re probably a little high on those numbers.we can probably keep all three,but putting and keeping players around them is going to be a problem
 
Back
Top