DPGSpurs
The Dude Abides
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2025
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 109
It’s not really about that at all tbh…winning a trade is subjective. It’s about process for me. Not resting on laurels and thinking things are good enough so you can take foot off gas.In my opinion, the flaw in your line of thinking is that you seem to expect the Spurs' FO to basically "win" every deal/trade/transaction. But that expectation, to me, is not only unrealistic, it's also kind of unnecessary. A lot of trades and deals in the NBA work in a checks and balances kind of way. Any organisation will always have to gauge what they want to achieve with a transaction (be it a trade, drafting or handing out contracts and extensions) and balance that with opportunity costs that will arise in trying to achieve said goal. I think that the so-called winners and losers of trades, for example, are often much less clear-cut than a lot of people make them out to be.
Anyway, long story short, "winning" a deal/trade/transaction in the short term shouldn't be the ultimate goal - making your team better or putting your franchise in a position to be able to make it better down the road should be the goal.
It’s not about trades only. It’s about draft. G-league and end of bench rosters. All phases.