Game Thread Spurs (8-3) vs Warriors (7-6) (Fri 11/14/25) [8:30PM CDT]

These aren’t MUST-WIN games for the Spurs right now—they’re still on the COME UP. This is a team projected to take a step into the play-in, and we’ve all been a little fooled by their early-season masquerade as a top-three squad. Sure, they could pull it off if everything goes WRIGHT and not MITCH. It all comes down to whether MITCH is the real deal or just FOOL’S GOLD, as y’all like to say.

For the Warriors, this was a MUST-WIN—just as Area 51.247 proclaimed. They’re in a frantic race against Father Time, clinging to relevance like it’s the last lifeboat on the Titanic. Watching Curry nurse a shoulder tweak, Butler roll an ankle, and Draymond finally—after a “dynasty”—get whistled for his slapstick routine of MOVING screens (as if auditioning for the NFL as a pulling guard) only hammers home the truth: they might be destined for another season as a bottom-seed, play-in hopeful. That is, unless Draymond and Butler decide to settle matters WWE-style in a backstage brawl.
We're on the come up only because Wemby is still on his rookie deal.
Other than that, we should be able to win games against veteran teams grasping for straws to stay relevant.

Fox got a max extension.
Devin and Keldon are earning a lot of money for what they offer.
Barnes is a proven winner.
Wemby is a top5 player in the league.
Castle is ROTY.

The only one who doesn't look ready other than Devin/Keldon is Mitch.
 
Vassel isn't a fit in his current role. He wants to be a first or 2nd option scorer. He's not good enough to be a first option. On a bad team could probably be a 2nd option with high volume.

We now have Fox and Castle that should get the ball and shots before Vassel. With Harper comes back he should also get them before Vassel.

Vassell in theory should be a good defender but he isn't. So we have a below average defender who wants to be a 2nd option but we need him to be more like a 4th option.

A legit 3 and D wing fixes a lot with this team.
 
So quick question i'm pretty sure I know the answer to but want to make sure.

On the Draymond foul on Wemby's oop dunk, Kerr fought (successfully) for the basket to not count and say it was on the floor...would it not just be a foul before inbounds then? Isn't that a free throw and then possession back? Or is that only in the last 2 minutes of a quarter or something?
I thought the same thing. I find it funny that the refs allow Wemby to get beat up the entire game, then call that a foul and screw the Spurs and Wemby out of a basket and the foul. Or at the very least two free throws and the ball.

What happened on that possession? I can't remember if the Spurs scored or not.
 
We're on the come up only because Wemby is still on his rookie deal.
Other than that, we should be able to win games against veteran teams grasping for straws to stay relevant.

Fox got a max extension.
Devin and Keldon are earning a lot of money for what they offer.
Barnes is a proven winner.
Wemby is a top5 player in the league.
Castle is ROTY.

The only one who doesn't look ready other than Devin/Keldon is Mitch.
The problem is that Curry is still playing at a high enough level that him and the Warriors can defeat young inexperienced teams but not title contenders. They have done that the last few years in the playoffs taking out higher seeds in the Grizzlies, Kings, Rockets. In all of those series it was their experience along with Curry going nuclear that allowed them to win.

Spurs played like a young inexperienced team last night when it really mattered. Look at how confused and flustered they were when the Warriors were playing zone in the 4th quarter. A veteran team would have been able to pick apart that zone very easily instead of struggling to score against it.

They also fell apart when Curry was going off. The Spurs during their title years could weather the storm when a player was going off for 40 plus and still win the game by making key defensive stops and clutch buckets. Look at those games in the playoffs when they would let Amare score 40 plus points and still win a close game in the 4th quarter by shutting down everybody else.

Lastly they committed a lot of dumb turnovers in the 4th quarter especially in the final minutes. That's something a veteran team doesn't do. You can't make these types of mistakes against an experience team as the Warriors and win the game.
 
I have no problem saying how great Curry is, but I do find it strange that he's considered "peak entertainment" in basketball. To me, sharpshooters can never be as entertaining as...any other style of superstar, really. Dunkers, leapers, guys with crazy footwork, even inefficient midrange artists are visually pleasing to the eye. I guess for me it comes down to variety. If you've seen one Curry performance, you've seen them all.
I’ve always loved shooters. Ray Allen, Peja, Nash, Dirk, Curry, KD. Always have fascinated me
 
The problem is that Curry is still playing at a high enough level that him and the Warriors can defeat young inexperienced teams but not title contenders. They have done that the last few years in the playoffs taking out higher seeds in the Grizzlies, Kings, Rockets. In all of those series it was their experience along with Curry going nuclear that allowed them to win.

Spurs played like a young inexperienced team last night when it really mattered. Look at how confused and flustered they were when the Warriors were playing zone in the 4th quarter. A veteran team would have been able to pick apart that zone very easily instead of struggling to score against it.

They also fell apart when Curry was going off. The Spurs during their title years could weather the storm when a player was going off for 40 plus and still win the game by making key defensive stops and clutch buckets. Look at those games in the playoffs when they would let Amare score 40 plus points and still win a close game in the 4th quarter by shutting down everybody else.

Lastly they committed a lot of dumb turnovers in the 4th quarter especially in the final minutes. That's something a veteran team doesn't do. You can't make these types of mistakes against an experience team as the Warriors and win the game.
As I wrote earlier, we should've beaten them in the first half, but we had 14 turnovers and Wemby cosplayed as a shooting guard.

Our chances were low as soon as we entered clutch time.
 
Understandable that some people might be emotionally on the edge but this has been my opinion since the day Mitch took the reins to the team and I have multiple posts prior to these losses stating the same thought. I've gone through the highs of the dynasty period and been through the lows of watching Uwe Blab, Zarko Paspalj, and Lloyd Daniels on the team. Does that qualify my opinion above others? No but I call it like I see it without homer glasses even if I deeply consider this "my team". I want success for this team more than any individual coach or player and it manifests itself as cold, calculated thoughts that inform my conversations and forum posts. In the end, they are just opinions and I enjoy hearing the thoughts of others and even getting my own challenged. Debate and screaming irrationally about sports is the spice of life!
From what I am seeing right now, he is definitely in over his head when it comes to X’s and O’s going up against a great veteran coach like Steve Kerr with championships. That’s understandable. Obviously I’m hoping this improves and it should just with some time and experience. But I’m not ready to throw our coach under the bus. Not at all. This team has a lot of talent and overall, it’s a very exciting time to be a Spurs fan.
 
Nobody will ever master shooting a basketball like Steph. His abilities defy science. I’m fine if he acts corny about it.
 
I'm ok with a defeat, but sad that it was a Cup game. Really was hoping to make some noise there (after the win vs Rockets).

Last years NBA Finals was a duell of the Cup runner ups of the two previous years.
 
Still trying to wrap my head around how the coaching staff just let Curry do that to us in consecutive games. How do you not just shift the whole game plan and make a shittier player beat you? Literally reminds me of that scene from Casino.


 
I have no problem saying how great Curry is, but I do find it strange that he's considered "peak entertainment" in basketball. To me, sharpshooters can never be as entertaining as...any other style of superstar, really. Dunkers, leapers, guys with crazy footwork, even inefficient midrange artists are visually pleasing to the eye. I guess for me it comes down to variety. If you've seen one Curry performance, you've seen them all.

First, I will say, he is a freaking phenomenal shooter, but I also don't really enjoy watching him when it comes to shooting. He's also got pretty great handles too - definitely gotta give him props there. I was a shooter myself (obviously nowhere near as good as Curry) and it doesn't excite me much watching him. For example, I wish I was taller or had insane athleticism to be able to jump out the gym, speed, handles etc. I guess for me, since shooting came easy for me, it doesn't do much for me. I was always impressed by the guys that seemed more like super human type players when I was growing up. D-Rob, Jordan, Shaq etc. From my perspective, I like watching other players that do things I couldn't do.

Mate, shooting is an important part of the game and seeing Curry just do things beyond things, is so entertaining. He is so damn good.

Yeah, he's an amazing shooter. His dad was great too. I used to like those Hornets teams with Glenn Rice. For a quick minute there, I was a big Glenn Rice fan and I loved that shooting combination with Del Curry. That Hornets team was a fun team. Funny story, when I was a kid at my friends house, we were watching a Hornets game that another friend had recorded, and the announcer kept mentioning "Curry and Rice" and my friend's older sister's boyfriend walked in who knew nothing about basketball and was like WTF, why do they keep mentioning curry and rice all the time during the basketball game? We had to tell him those are the player's names ;). We never even thought about it until then - how it sounds to someone that doesn't follow basketball or know who they are.

I disagree. He's fucking amazing to watch. I'd rather watch him when he does this than just about anything.

It just isn't as much fun when he's roasting your team.

Fair point, and I agree. If he was doing it to some other team, it'd be a bit more fun to watch. When he's doing it against your team, it sucks seeing it. It's a bit demoralizing really. He's reached an insane level as a shooter. I'm just impressed he's able to do it in games. Lots of players can shoot the ball well by themselves, lots of players can hit open shots, but Curry can hit any shot.

I think like Spursgenius said, teams are giving the Spurs their best shots. I was thinking about it earlier today, and I don't think the Spurs sucked and barely squeaked out wins against some of these bottom teams because they were lucky, I think these teams played some/one of their best games of the season. Phoenix, I think that win gave them a huge boost and they're actually looking pretty good so far. That single win may have propelled them. I hope the same doesn't happen for the Warriors now that they've won these two games against the Spurs.
 
The perimeter D really sux. We have also allow Cam Thomas and Trey Murphy to go off for 40+

SGA or Tyreese Maxey gonna go off for 50+ on us tbh
The coaches don’t demand perimeter defense. It’s obvious. You have the best shot blocker in game and you are scared to fucking play them tight in the perimeter. Don’t get it at all. Having Wemby back there means you can play the perimeter tight.
 
Curry finishing so well on 2 pointers (15-28 in those two games, I think) should maybe even be more of a focus than his threes. He had some straight up crazy finishes inside the arc, though. Apart from that, Mitch going back to the two-bigs lineup with Wemby and Kornet clearly didn't work again after the first game against the same opponent.
 
Curry finishing so well on 2 pointers (15-28 in those two games, I think) should maybe even be more of a focus than his threes. He had some straight up crazy finishes inside the arc, though. Apart from that, Mitch going back to the two-bigs lineup with Wemby and Kornet clearly didn't work again after the first game against the same opponent.
Yea double big against the Warriors just means double the amount of defenders Curry can easily exploit. I'd be fine "conceding" mid range shots to Curry if it meant much better coverage on his 3's assuming Wemby is in the game to deter him from pushing all the in for layups.
 
Curry is so ridiculous lol. Gonna miss Steph heater games more than anybody from this generation. But spurstalk people hated him because he wiggles his shoulders
I hate his antics but I respect that he's still balling at 37 even though he struggled with injuries earlier in his career and has stuck with his team. I'm definitely not like some that are just like "retire already". It's fun to watch him when he's not playing the Spurs.
 
I respect Curry’s skill over someone like Giannis or even Jokic mainly because it makes you believe (however delusional) you can be just as good of a basketball player as Curry is without needing to be super athletic or big like those other two.
 
I will definitely not miss Curry when he retires. I'm just not a fan of his game. I will acknowledge he is the GOAT shooter but never enjoyed watching him play or his antics along with him being teamed up with that thug Draymond.
 
1. When Wama jammed over Draymond Green, right after the shit stain was mouthing off and shoving him.
Refs called it a floor foul and took away the basket. No continuation. Is that the correct call off an inbounds?

2. When Curry shot the three and then pointed his finger and hand straight out in front of himself. A Spur may have tapped Stephias finger, or may he was not touched at all. Was Stephina touched at all? It looked like not just a simple missed call or even a badly blown call, but a complete fraudulent call.
The Spurs player came from the side, then went past Stephina after the shot was launched.

Was watching on Prime TV, and their announcers were sucking off the Warriors big time.
Replay was inconclusive. The angle i saw looked like the pampered pussy didn't get hit at all. Or even if he did just basic follow thru contact that is let go 99% of the time.
Sorry not sorry i don't respect Curry near as much as some of you do, given that his is given fraudulent calls to the level of rigged Laker games / Kobme Bryant calls.
Mentally it certainly frees up your shooting game if you know you will be given FTs for virtually anything. Also it makes the defense back off at other times, knnowing if they breath on you it will be called a foul.
Yes i know he can shoot, yes he is a most excellent shooter. Lots of fraudulent help tho.
I can can a lot ot shots in an empty gym. Ok the gyms certainly not empty but same idea.
 
Last edited:
I’ve always loved shooters. Ray Allen, Peja, Nash, Dirk, Curry, KD. Always have fascinated me

Peja's eldest, Andrej is a Jr at Illinois averaging 13.7ppg, but isn't really that great of a career 3pt shooter. He did make 82% of his FT last season (on 165 attempts).

He's a SRP target for me... it'll be great when draft and then trade him for cash.
 
1. When Wama jammed over Draymond Green, right after the shit stain was mouthing off and shoving him.
Refs called it a floor foul and took away the basket. No continuation. Is that the correct call off an inbounds?

2. When Curry shot the three and then pointed his finger and hand straight out in front of himself. A Spur may have tapped Stephias finger, or may he was not touched at all. Was Stephina touched at all? It looked like not just a simple missed call or even a badly blown call, but a complete fraudulent call.
The Spurs player came from the side, then went past Stephina after the shot was launched.

Was watching on Prime TV, and their announcers were sucking off the Warriors big time.
Replay was inconclusive. The angle i saw looked like the pampered pussy didn't get hit at all. Or even if he did just basic follow thru contact that is let go 99% of the time.
Sorry not sorry i don't respect Curry near as much as some of you do, given that his is given fraudulent calls to the level of rigged Laker games / Kobme Bryant calls.
Mentally it certainly frees up your shooting game if you know you will be given FTs for virtually anything. Also it makes the defense back off at other times, knnowing if they breath on you it will be called a foul.
Yes i know he can shoot, yes he is a most excellent shooter. Lots of fraudulent help tho.
I can can a lot ot shots in an empty gym. Ok the gyms certainly not empty but same idea.
The three free throw foul was bogus
 
The emotions of a couple of tough losses are really shining through here. Everybody take a deep breath and calm the hell down. It’s so early in the season.
The Spurs are a first round playoff exit team. So I am mainly here to watch some good regular season games and get a few wins over quality teams. So far we only have one quality win, so everybody is entitled to get emotional after these two games against the Warriors.
 
Back
Top