So probably a similar gameplay to what they did against OKC. Sit him in the 1st, play him 5-6 min in the 2nd Qtr, another 5-8 min in the 3rd, and then the majority of the 4th.
Nah man I'll take a win over a veteran Knicks team with lots of playoff experience who is probably going to win the east or at least make the ECF. May be a lot of media hype but a win tonight tells me they're not buying too into it because if they're not razor sharp Brunson and Co will run them off the floor.its probably better if they lose. it doesnt count in the standings so no harm. would serve as a helpful reality check that beating okc yesterday doesnt mean you can take it easy tomorrow, every game is hard. the media narrative around them winning is nice, but maybe dont let them get too full of themselves after some nice december wins. remember how heavy they were celebrating after winning against miami and proceeded to get blown out by phoenix?
he played 20 min against OKC. If he plays 25 against the Knicks he can play in the firstSo probably a similar gameplay to what they did against OKC. Sit him in the 1st, play him 5-6 min in the 2nd Qtr, another 5-8 min in the 3rd, and then the majority of the 4th
thats a fair pointNah man I'll take a win over a veteran Knicks team with lots of playoff experience who is probably going to win the east or at least make the ECF. May be a lot of media hype but a win tonight tells me they're not buying too into it because if they're not razor sharp Brunson and Co will run them off the floor.
They’ll just hide him on Barnes or ChampI think this would be a good game to try out Fox, Castle, and Harper at the same time on the court, that way we can put pressure on Brunson defensively.
They’ll just hide him on Barnes or Champ
So long as it doesn’t take them away from what they’re actually trying to do on offense, sure.Don't let Brunson hide/rest. Take his legs by running them (or Vassell, who he'll probably start on) off off-ball screens and in Barnes' case, post him.