Draft 2026 NBA Draft Prospects Thread

Thanks for kicking this off!
 
Seeing this thread made me to go TaT to see who might be available around the end of the first round... saw a name that was very familiar: Yaxel Lendeborg. I was interested in trading down from 14 or trading up from our 2nd round pick to get this guy last year before he pulled out of the draft. We've had good history with older prospects around the end of the 1st round.

Then I remembered the Atlanta swap and went to see where they are at currently... and saw the prospect posted above is mocked to us at #9 with the Atlanta pick. That is just crazy.
 
With the NIL money, a lot of foreigners are now playing in NCAA.

Among players that are staying overseas, the most likely candidate for Spurs/Hawks first round pick seems to be Karim Lopez. He is a Mexican player currently playing in New Zealand/Australia who fits well Spurs' needs. It's still very early in the draft process and I haven't seen him play full games, so I won't go further, but his profile is intriguing.
 
Another aspect to consider is depth of draft class, NIL caused many players to stay in College rather than declaring for the draft, but those players eventually need to declare for the draft. In the long run things will stabilize, but the reduction of the talent pool we saw last year means that build up of talent will enter the draft in the next couple of years, when Spurs probably won't be picking top 10 (hopefully Atlanta implodes, but we can't count on it). With most teams going for underclassmen, it could be an opportunity for the Spurs to heavily scout the draft deeply, which they haven't done in like 25 years.

These are the likely Spurs picks:
  • FRP from Atlanta (say 10-20, most likely 15-20)
  • SRPs (right now) from Utah (likely 31-35), Portland and Miami (both 40-45).
This is a good opportunity to use or move up for more developed players, some I've liked in the past couple of years that were available at that SRP range include Ajay Mitchell, Adem Bona, Rasheer Fleming, Noah Penda, Kalkbrenner, Tyrese Proctor, all guys with positional value and a baseline of skills that at least won't take you 3 years to figure out, you can probably have a very good sense whether they'll contribute in a couple of years at most. Alternatively, use those picks for a more established vet, roll them over if the price is right, just don't pick another Juan Nuñez, Sidy Cissoko, etc, which are players with a high development cost (years) and low chance of success (low value archetype, fatal flaws, etc).
 
^ Aside of Carter Bryant, Spurs third unit is currently Waters (28 years old), McLaughlin (29), Olynyk (34) and Biyombo (33).

Spurs just aren't interested in having young players to develop at their end of their bench.
 
^ Aside of Carter Bryant, Spurs third unit is currently Waters (28 years old), McLaughlin (29), Olynyk (34) and Biyombo (33).

Spurs just aren't interested in having young players to develop at their end of their bench.
They’re interested in cheap. Right now that means grizzled vets, but that doesn’t mean it always will. In two years, i can see it being DJG, and some second round selections,with maybe one vet. Bryant will likely be in the rotation at that point.
 
^ Aside of Carter Bryant, Spurs third unit is currently Waters (28 years old), McLaughlin (29), Olynyk (34) and Biyombo (33).

Spurs just aren't interested in having young players to develop at their end of their bench.
Ajay Mitchell or Kalkbrenner are better than any of them. And if OKC can afford to develop 2nd rounders into valuable role players, if Spurs can't do it sure as hell isn't because they don't have room on their roster. Might speak of their confidence in their own scouting and development abilities, tbh.
 
^ Aside of Carter Bryant, Spurs third unit is currently Waters (28 years old), McLaughlin (29), Olynyk (34) and Biyombo (33).

Spurs just aren't interested in having young players to develop at their end of their bench.
I think the logic is that Spurs have a lot of rotation players to develop and that they want to have some kind of guarantees in third string in case of young players not living up to their potential because the expectation is to win games and we can't afford to have Branhams and Wesleys out there when someone is unavailable.

Castle, Harper, Bryant and DJG is enough players to develop.
 
Ajay Mitchell or Kalkbrenner are better than any of them. And if OKC can afford to develop 2nd rounders into valuable role players, if Spurs can't do it sure as hell isn't because they don't have room on their roster. Might speak of their confidence in their own scouting and development abilities, tbh.
I agree with you and I don't like Spurs way of using their early second round picks.

As for why they are doing that, I think they have come to the conclusion that it's too much of a long shot to develop players that are marginal talents and that won't have consistent quality playing time at first.

Whether or not they're right on that, having half-promising young players at the end of the bench is more fun for fans than these vets with no upside.
 
I think the logic is that Spurs have a lot of rotation players to develop and that they want to have some kind of guarantees in third string in case of young players not living up to their potential because the expectation is to win games and we can't afford to have Branhams and Wesleys out there when someone is unavailable.

Castle, Harper, Bryant and DJG is enough players to develop.
That argument relies on the flawed premise that all picks and prospects are created equal and every player you take is as risky and time consuming a proposal as Wesley and Branham (and Cissokos and Nuñez and ....). There's another way, which is the OKC way, where you target players a) with functional archetypes in today's NBA b) further along their development process c) with less upside but far higher floor. This allows them to filter and rotate through them faster (1/2 years before they move on) and speed up the process, whereas the Spurs clog the pipeline deliberately by taking their kind of raw, flawed prospects that take years even to ascertain failure. It's not coincidence that Spurs haven't developed a long term role player from a 2nd rounder in like 20 years (a couple shor term ones like Tre Jones and Blair) while most of the league has done far better, let alone the elite teams like OKC. Spurs have a clear deficit in this area, they've had that for a long time and I hope they address it soon before they keep wasting precious opportunities.
 
Moving my Caleb Wilson propaganda from the Atlanta Pick Thread into this one:

AJ Dybantsa, Cam Boozer, and Darryn Peterson have been getting most of the media buzz, and rightfully so, but look out for Caleb Wilson out of UNC. The Freshman out of Atlanta, GA looks good so far this season. He's a 6'10 PF who is a versatile defensive monster, but also has a nice offensive game and jumper that extends out to the 3-point line. Would be a nice front-court pairing partner with Wemby. I guarantee he'll be all over the Spurs radar if he isn't already tbh.


Another big game from the guy who is quickly becoming my pet cat of the draft (outside of the top-3), albeit against inferior competition. You can see the defensive potential and physical tools though. This kid will end up going top-6 in the Draft imo.


 
Homie's name is a species of wood and an accumulation of decayed organic matter. Tell me his parents were botanists or some shit
So he’s the product of some wood meeting some squishy moist organic matter. Aren’t we all?
 
Back
Top