SpursBills
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2025
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 199
Just anecdotal, but I feel like Castle goes through these stretches every once in a while where he goes through multiple games where his shot looks terrible and he has to take a couple days off (presumably to put up a thousand shots) and then returns with an improved percentage. Like last year when they were delayed by the LA wildfires and he hired a personal trainer. Or this year when he had to take some time off from his hip flexor injury. Maybe he just needs to take a game or two off and go back in the gym to recharge his shooting bank by putting up another thousand shots.
Long term, and this applies to both Castle and Harper, but our rebounding and struggles against physicality are directly tied to how much their shot improves. With as much as Mitch values spacing, I feel like the more gravity Castle/Harper have, the more willing he is to play a 4 that sacrifices some shooting in favor of rebounding and secondary rim protection (i.e. a PJ Washington type vs Harrison Barnes). If they continue to be 30% shooters on low-medium volume, Mitch is probably going to want to continue to roll with a wing at the 4 spot, and the Spurs are always going to have problems against teams with bigger or more physical frontcourts. Ultimately, while rim pressure and elite ball handling and above average size are essential, having below average shooting from both your backcourt guys puts a ton of pressure on your frontcourt to shoot, and that's not very efficient economically. It's way less expensive and more economical to have a smaller guard that can shoot and a big forward that can protect the rim and rebound than it is to have a big guard that can't shoot but can rebound and defend with a small wing that can shoot but is a below average defender/rebounder. In order to take full advantage of being big, our guards also can't give up the advantages that traditional guards have over them.
Long term, and this applies to both Castle and Harper, but our rebounding and struggles against physicality are directly tied to how much their shot improves. With as much as Mitch values spacing, I feel like the more gravity Castle/Harper have, the more willing he is to play a 4 that sacrifices some shooting in favor of rebounding and secondary rim protection (i.e. a PJ Washington type vs Harrison Barnes). If they continue to be 30% shooters on low-medium volume, Mitch is probably going to want to continue to roll with a wing at the 4 spot, and the Spurs are always going to have problems against teams with bigger or more physical frontcourts. Ultimately, while rim pressure and elite ball handling and above average size are essential, having below average shooting from both your backcourt guys puts a ton of pressure on your frontcourt to shoot, and that's not very efficient economically. It's way less expensive and more economical to have a smaller guard that can shoot and a big forward that can protect the rim and rebound than it is to have a big guard that can't shoot but can rebound and defend with a small wing that can shoot but is a below average defender/rebounder. In order to take full advantage of being big, our guards also can't give up the advantages that traditional guards have over them.
