Trade Spurs Trade Ideas

Trading for Bobby Portis likely means that Spurs won't be able to keep both Champagnie and KJ after 2027. Given their ages and what Champagie and KJ are showing this season, I rather stick with them.
 
Bruno said:
Trading for Bobby Portis likely means that Spurs won't be able to keep both Champagnie and KJ after 2027. Given their ages and what Champagie and KJ are showing this season, I rather stick with them.
Click to expand...
not true at all. Portis contract expires in 2027. You're just saying that because you'd like to renegotiate everybody's contract while they still signed for cheap.
 
Vienna said:
I understand the contract of Vassell will be a problem at some point. If we discuss trading for a quality (starting) role player, he will get (or demand) money in the region of the Vassell contract. While Vassell might be seen as a quality role player by some, I wouldn't rank him there. So, if Spurs want to improve his spot, he will be the contract to move and therefore get a player with a similar contract (or less expensive), who ist either better, or a better fit.

So, I would be all in for a TM3 trade, but we might ask what other player could be had for that 25-30M per salary. Would Wiggins sign an extension for that money, assuming he will opt out this summer. Like, say, 3 years /80 M? Would the Heat trade him for Vassell, if they think they will lose him after this season?
Click to expand...
TM3 would get no more shots than Vassell does. Any additional would have to come from Fox,Wemby,Castle, or Harper. He would just be the new guy to say “why are we paying this dude so much when he only scores 14 points?”.
 
Exstatic said:
TM3 would get no more shots than Vassell does. Any additional would have to come from Fox,Wemby,Castle, or Harper. He would just be the new guy to say “why are we paying this dude so much when he only scores 14 points?”.
Click to expand...
I feel like our biggest need is a legit PF or a PF/C, Aldama being the prime target.
Castle guardin Sengun for a stretch was nice, but in reality our lack of size at PF will be the biggest issue in most matchups.
Barnes would get murdered by Gordon and Randle, even Lebron.

And he's also a nice connector, knows how to play.
If only there was another Diaw, would be just perfect for this team.
 
LeBowen said:
I feel like our biggest need is a legit PF or a PF/C, Aldama being the prime target.
Castle guardin Sengun for a stretch was nice, but in reality our lack of size at PF will be the biggest issue in most matchups.
Barnes would get murdered by Gordon and Randle, even Lebron.

And he's also a nice connector, knows how to play.
If only there was another Diaw, would be just perfect for this team.
Click to expand...
I want a big who can shoot, rebound,and is at
least defensively neutral.
 
LeBowen said:
I feel like our biggest need is a legit PF or a PF/C, Aldama being the prime target.
Castle guardin Sengun for a stretch was nice, but in reality our lack of size at PF will be the biggest issue in most matchups.
Barnes would get murdered by Gordon and Randle, even Lebron.

And he's also a nice connector, knows how to play.
If only there was another Diaw, would be just perfect for this team.
Click to expand...
Julius scoring averages is below his season average when he faces the Spurs with Barnes as the starting PF. This sounds really made up now, when you actually look at the games played. The before-season narratives linger because that’s what your beliefs hold, when it’s (the idea that the Spurs need a taller PF to face off opposing good PFs) clearly wrong more often than right.
 
Exstatic said:
I want a big who can shoot, rebound,and is at
least defensively neutral.
Click to expand...
The issue is that everyone who can do all those things costs a lot. Both in assets and cap space.

OK Computer said:
Julius scoring averages is below his season average when he faces the Spurs with Barnes as the starting PF. This sounds really made up now, when you actually look at the games played. The before-season narratives linger because that’s what your beliefs hold, when it’s (the idea that the Spurs need a taller PF to face off opposing good PFs) clearly wrong more often than right.
Click to expand...
Randle is the definition of inconsistency. But when he gets going, he's the difference maker for Minnesota because Edwards usually does his part.
Regular season is one thing, playoffs are completely different.
Wemby can get up to the required level of doing it all by himself in the paint once every handful of regular season games, but everyone's plan in the playoffs will be to beat him up and punish the fact that Barnes is on 1 rebound per 30 minutes played pace.
We need different personnel for different matchups.
 
If the idea is for getting a contract that lasts till 2027..then the Spurs should kick the tires on a trade for Michael Porter Jr and see what it would take to pry him from the Nets. If it's just one FRP, a swap and a few SRPs for Barnes, Olynyk and Sochan...the Spurs should just go for it. But anything more should give them pause.
 
If we don't go for a bigger move (which I'd like to see) then to me the lower end move I'd like to see is Olynyk + Sochan + 2 2nds for Rui + Knecht
 
There absolutely won't be a big impact trade, but I can see a Sochan (and Kelly) for someone in need of a second chance (Knecht?) move.
 
PocketMonger said:
Pick two:

1. Can Shoot.
2. Can defend and rebound.
3. Won't cost a ton of assets to acquire and retain.
Click to expand...
1 and 3.

Unless Spurs really think they can get that one magic piece that is going to put it all together, not worth sacrificing future flexibility for a win-now piece just to go all in on this year.
 
CGD said:
This one is confusing. I thought he was "so instrumental" to their success, etc.
Click to expand...
They needed him to get past Dallas and their big man cadre. Mavs won’t be a playoff factor for a while, and IHart is a huge burden on the OKC apron figure.
 
Exstatic said:
They needed him to get past Dallas and their big man cadre. Mavs won’t be a playoff factor for a while, and IHart is a huge burden on the OKC apron figure.
Click to expand...
Which is what makes it confusing. They can decline the option on Hart and be right at the borderline of the first apron next season, but if they take money back for him they're straight second apron next season. Unless they just wanna move him for expirings and picks.
 
Robz4000 said:
Even with his decline I'd rather keep Barnes than add Huerter tbh.
Click to expand...
Barnes was going for Aldama...Huerter was for Sochan and filler. I also think we should send Waters + 2 2nds to nola for Alvarado.

Aldama, Huerter, and Alvarado would cover alot of holes in different lineups. We can add more shooting or perimeter D as needed and Aldama addresses weakside D and rebounding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

scott
Analysis GRADES: 11/28/25 SPURS 139 @ NUGGETS 136
Replies
19
Views
605
heyheymymy
heyheymymy
LeBowen
Analysis Spurs draft assets, cap situation and future projections
2 3 4
Replies
92
Views
4K
DTW
D
LeBowen
Game Thread Spurs (18-7) vs Wizards (4-20) (Thu 12/18/25) [7:00PM CDT]
19 20 21
Replies
520
Views
7K
wEmBoY
wEmBoY
Fabbs
Lobs. The vast improvement of the incoming passes.
Replies
2
Views
108
bozhemoi
bozhemoi
scott
Analysis GRADES: 12/08/2025 Spurs 135 @ Pelicans 132
Replies
10
Views
356
Splits
Splits
Back
Top