Why?Not feeling as good about this since Trae is gone.
And the Mavs aren't saying no... sunk cost fallacy is at play, but man that Luka trade is getting worse and worse and it's not even because Luka is showing out.Someone is trying to get AD for free with expiring contracts.
Why?
It would be the best case scenario for us.
They'd have to send Porzingis and one of Risacher/Okongwu, making the team worse since AD won't be back before March at the earliest.
Porzingis probably gets bought out and maybe we can get him that way.
AD will inevitably get injured next season, making the '27 pick we own more valuable.
They're stuck in the play-in zone, regardless.They look much much better without Young, and knowing there is a pick swap they seem to be going all in for a playoff spot which in a very weak east is possible.
Maybe Atlanta is finally looking at our swap as a sunk cost.And the Mavs aren't saying no... sunk cost fallacy is at play, but man that Luka trade is getting worse and worse and it's not even because Luka is showing out.
I think Mr. Day Sleeper is not feeling as good about the Hawks pick because they traded Trae and that makes them better... not because they might trade for AD (which I agree would make them worse).They're stuck in the play-in zone, regardless.
If they trade away their bigs for AD, they won't win many games before AD returns.
It's really difficult to win NBA games without servicable bigs.I think Mr. Day Sleeper is not feeling as good about the Hawks pick because they traded Trae and that makes them better... not because they might trade for AD (which I agree would make them worse).
Yeah, I'd much prefer they get AD, I'll definitely take my chances with his injuries but Shams is saying out til POs.Why?
It would be the best case scenario for us.
They'd have to send Porzingis and one of Risacher/Okongwu, making the team worse since AD won't be back before March at the earliest.
Porzingis probably gets bought out and maybe we can get him that way.
AD will inevitably get injured next season, making the '27 pick we own more valuable.
Also leaves Dallas with Gafford + Lively + Okongwu, that likely surpresses all of their values.It's really difficult to win NBA games without servicable bigs.
If both Okongwu and Porzingis are traded, it's not a functional roster anymore with just Gueye.
You have to think one of them goes elsewhere to a 3rd team that can bring Dallas other assets.Also leaves Dallas with Gafford + Lively + Okongwu, that likely surpresses all of their values.
And Barnes + Oly + Sochan doesn't work hahahahaSomeone is trying to get AD for free with expiring contracts.
Yeah but it'd be selling at rock bottom dollar for Gafford or Lively and still leaves ATL without an NBA C.You have to think one of them goes elsewhere to a 3rd team that can bring Dallas other assets.
They're stuck in the play-in zone, regardless.
If they trade away their bigs for AD, they won't win many games before AD returns.
Could definitely see the Lakers but don't see how that's even possible.Does anyone really think Atlanta is the team interested in trading for AD? If not who could it be.... I just dont see anyone else...
Who do the Lakers need to add if it's a package around Austin Reaves? I wonder if Dallas would be interested in Reaves? Lakers need defense and I don't think Reaves is someone that can keep playing with Luka and Lebron (unless they believe they can build around Luka and Austin long term?). Yeah, no idea how the Lakers would be able to get him back.Could definitely see the Lakers but don't see how that's even possible.
Warriors but it'd take Green + Kuminga and neither are expiring.
Otherwise, no one else seems to make sense didn't AD is supposed to be out until POs.
That or KP’s Potts makes things super unpredictable for themIt's really difficult to win NBA games without servicable bigs.
If both Okongwu and Porzingis are traded, it's not a functional roster anymore with just Gueye.
It would be absolutely HILARIOUS if they did a deal of AD for Reaves, considering DAL could have had AD *and* Reaves last year had they simply bothered to ask.Who do the Lakers need to add if it's a package around Austin Reaves? I wonder if Dallas would be interested in Reaves? Lakers need defense and I don't think Reaves is someone that can keep playing with Luka and Lebron (unless they believe they can build around Luka and Austin long term?). Yeah, no idea how the Lakers would be able to get him back.
...and then Reaves goes back to LA in the summer as a free agent.It would be absolutely HILARIOUS if they did a deal of AD for Reaves, considering DAL could have had AD *and* Reaves last year had they simply bothered to ask.
That would be completely legal. The rule prevents him from being traded, waived/bought out by his new team, and then re-signing with the old team. But if his contract naturally expires, he can go back to his old team....and then Reaves goes back to LA in the summer as a free agent.
(Is that even legal? I think there's a rule about being traded and going back in free agency, I always forget.)
Like you said, LA doesn't have what it takes to make it work. GS I just dont see. If AD were healthy I could see it, but i don't see them making the move hoping they could build some sort of chemistry on the fly in the post season. The same stands to reason for any playoff team.Could definitely see the Lakers but don't see how that's even possible.
Warriors but it'd take Green + Kuminga and neither are expiring.
Otherwise, no one else seems to make sense didn't AD is supposed to be out until POs.