LeBowen
Believe
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2025
- Messages
- 1,918
- Reaction score
- 1,484
I absolutely see no valid excuse for the league not to start in mid-September other than those takes about how they don't want to overlap with both NFL and MLB in September which never made sense to me.I like this idea the best. Like you said, eliminating the b2bs and the crazy stretches like 6 games in 9 days (like we just did between @POR and @CLE).
NBA players are expected to start with their individual work in July, having two months of individual work and then another month of preseason makes absolutely no sense.
Both the viewership and the arena attendances would be higher with longer seasons because most casual fans get fed up with watching their team play every other night unless they're true contenders.
Not to mention that in these 6 months of regular season we have the all-star break, holidays etc, resulting in even more congested scheduling.
~15th September to ~15th April should be the norm and I don't see any relevant downsides.
I'm really not sure.Interesting idea about more incentive for Top Teams... I've never thought about that. This might be unnecessarily complicated, but what if your number of Home Games in Rd 1 was tied to your regular season win%? Like if OKC goes out and wins 75 games, then they get 6 Home Games in Rd 1. So to get 6 home games you'd have to get 65 wins... to get 5 home games you'd have to get 53 wins (maybe you bump this up to 58, because 50-55 wins is pretty common). This would only be for the first round.
And I'm not sure if the play-in is a good thing.
It just devalues the regular season even more. You play for 82 games and then it can all be for nothing in just one game with modern basketball being such a random sport at times.
I'd say the best teams should be awarded with some kind of a bye win in the first round.
But the NBA would never allow it because they don't want to lose on that extra viewership revenue.
Let's say something like 1st/2nd seed wouldn't have to play in the 1st round if they have 25 more wins than their 7th/8th seed matchups?
Then again, would top teams even want to get cold and not play for a couple of weeks?
There's absolutely no reason for 48 minutes of game time to be stretched out to ~150 minutes.The first half challenges (and maybe all of them) they should just have them reviewed centrally and someone from HQ tells the refs the answer instead of having them stare at a 24" monitor for 5 minutes.
FIBA games are just 8 minutes shorter and most games don't come even close to two hours of broadcast time.

