spursistan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2025
- Messages
- 1,164
- Reaction score
- 1,196
Overall very good game by Castle.
Turnovers are a chronic problem.
Hope coaching staff is addressing. Because i do not see improvement in the turnover area.
Mental, not physical.
The comparison makes me smh because they’re stylistically so different anyway. Castle is closer to Wade than Butler.By the way, one of the best things about Jimmy Butler is that he just does not turn the ball over. For a guy who was the best player on two teams to reach the Finals, his TO% is just absurdly low. Also, he is a really efficient player when it comes to scoring. So yeah, maybe we should hold our horses a bit with Castle as Butler 2.0.
Castle has around a 7:2 assist to turnover ratio my dude. And Butler wasn't a point guard, he was strictly a play finisher.By the way, one of the best things about Jimmy Butler is that he just does not turn the ball over. For a guy who was the best player on two teams to reach the Finals, his TO% is just absurdly low. Also, he is a really efficient player when it comes to scoring. So yeah, maybe we should hold our horses a bit with Castle as Butler 2.0.
Huh? No, he has not. On his two Miami Finals runs, Butler was the main creator offensively, not in a traditional point guard way, sure, but he was.Castle has around a 7:2 assist to turnover ratio my dude. And Butler wasn't a point guard, he was strictly a play finisher.
Even if we're generous and give him 2.5 - 1 that is not good when you Wemby on the team.He has better than a 2:1 assist to turnover ratio my dude.
Jimmy wasn’t that right out of the box. He was kind of a minor piece. He didn’t average the turnovers, or nearly the assists that castle is until he got to Miami, and it was kind of a two year blip of assists > 6.By the way, one of the best things about Jimmy Butler is that he just does not turn the ball over. For a guy who was the best player on two teams to reach the Finals, his TO% is just absurdly low. Also, he is a really efficient player when it comes to scoring. So yeah, maybe we should hold our horses a bit with Castle as Butler 2.0.
I loved this play, I couldn’t wait to watch it on the NBA Top Ten of the night.
Castle's overall TOV stats are not bad at all... I think what people are really saying when we mention is turnovers is that many of them are just lazy and completely avoidable, which makes them all the more frustrating - they are just preventable free possession's we're giving up...People are complaining about Castle turnovers and I get it, especially after this game. But he's shown very meaningful improvement since the beginning of the season, both from the eye test and statistically. Check the logs: https://www.espn.com/nba/player/gamelog/_/id/4845367/stephon-castle
He’s also barely 21. He has a lot of advanced attributes, but apparently high level ball security isn’t on that list.Castle's overall TOV stats are not bad at all... I think what people are really saying when we mention is turnovers is that many of them are just lazy and completely avoidable, which makes them all the more frustrating - they are just preventable free possession's we're giving up...
With that said, it seems like they've been greatly reduced from the first half of the season
Full disclosure, I think I wanted Sheppard, Starr then castle. So wrong.Just look back at the draft thread when people wanted Reed Sheppard or worse though Dillingham would be better than Castle lol
I liked Reed a solid bit as well (the theory of a lights out 3 point shooter around Wemby being devastating) but he really has such a narrow pathway to be a star. The offense has to hit to an insane degree to fully make up for the target he is on defense.Full disclosure, I think I wanted Sheppard, Starr then castle. So wrong.