Spurs vs. Pacers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama was the star, as expected, putting up a monster line:
22 points, 16 rebounds, 7 assists, 1 steal, 1 block in 22 minutes of action.
ESPN.com He was active on both ends, snagging rebounds, altering shots, and making plays in the paint. His midrange game showed signs of touch, and his rim pressure was consistent. If he keeps this level of focus, he’s going to be a nightmare matchup all year.
Grade: A
Devin Vassell
Vassell was solid, chipping in 14 points with efficient shooting (5-of-12 from the field, 2-of-5 from three) in 28 minutes.
ESPN.com He looked more comfortable in motion, cutting into open spots. There’s still room for more assertiveness, but this was a dependable night.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson brought energy off the bench, finishing with 11 points on 4-of-8 shooting and adding 4 rebounds in 19 minutes.
ESPN.com He’s showing signs of being that consistent secondary scorer the Spurs need — making smart cuts, being physical, and converting when given a chance.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Julian continues his push for rotation minutes: 8 points (3-of-5 FG, 2-of-3 from three) in just 11 minutes.
ESPN.com His stroke looked smooth, and he was active on the glass. The Spurs need that kind of depth, and he’s making a case.
Grade: B+
Stephon Castle
Castle threw in some flashes in his 19 minutes: he scored 12 points on 4-of-9 shooting (1-of-4 from deep), grabbed 2 boards, and had 3 assists.
ESPN.com He’s still raw, but his motor shows, and nights like this help his case for minutes.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
This was a rough night for Barnes: 0 points (0-for-4 FG, 0-for-2 from three) in 19 minutes, with 1 rebound and 1 assist.
ESPN.com It’s preseason, but if your veteran wing isn’t contributing, it becomes harder to justify a big role. He’ll need to respond quickly.
Grade: D
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo contributed in his usual way — non-scoring impact. In 11 minutes, he was physical, hustled for boards, and contested shots.
ESPN.com He may not light the scoreboard up, but his presence remains valuable in rotation.
Grade: B
Lindy Waters III
Waters was solid for what was asked: 8 points on 3-of-4 shooting (2-of-3 from three) in 11 minutes.
ESPN.com He plays with effort, gives hustle minutes, and can knock down open shots. That kind of role is important.
Grade: B
Harrison Ingram
Ingram logged 11 minutes, scoring 4 points (1-of-4 FG, 1-of-3 from three), with 2 rebounds, 1 assist, and 1 steal.
ESPN.com Not a standout night, but he showed a little length, activity, and willingness to mix in. He’s still fighting for consistency.
Grade: B-
David Jones-Garcia
Jones-Garcia had a productive night: 11 points in 18 minutes, knocking down 4-of-8 from three, grabbing 3 boards, and dishing 1 assist.
ESPN.com He’s carving out that 3-and-D role — the Spurs need shooters who can stretch defenses, and he’s beginning to make that role his.
Grade: B+
Carter Bryant
Bryant’s stat line (4 points on 1-of-3 FG, 2-of-2 FT, 3 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 block) isn’t gaudy, but his flashes were nice.
ESPN.com He remains a young guard still ironing out consistency, especially in decision-making, but his tools are still intriguing.
Grade: B
Riley Minix
Minix didn’t find much in limited time — 0 points in 3 minutes, no rebounds, no assists.
ESPN.com He still seems more like a two-way or developmental piece unless he ups his offensive impact.
Grade: C
Luke Kornet
Kornet delivered in perhaps his best showing yet. In 22 minutes, he pulled down 7 rebounds, scored 4 points, blocked 2, and showed activity around the rim.
ESPN.com He’s proving he can be a glue big — defensively stout, disciplined, and useful next to Wembanyama.
Grade: B+
Micah Potter
Potter played just 3 minutes and didn’t register much (0 points), but that’s not unexpected in this depth grouping.
ESPN.com He hasn’t made a strong enough impact yet to demand more looks.
Grade: C
Coaching / Rotation Notes
I like the way the coaching staff distributed minutes in this one: Wembanyama got a solid chunk, Kornet played next to him, and the Spurs got reliable production from their bench. The balance between giving younger players run and ensuring tempo control worked in their favor.
Grade: A-
Bottom line:
This was a strong team showing from the Spurs. They looked cohesive, got meaningful contributions from deep in the rotation, and didn’t lean on any one player too heavily. Wembanyama continues to dominate attention, but the secondary pieces are showing signs of life — and that’s what you want heading into the regular season.