Game Thread Spurs (59-18) @ Nuggets (49-28) (Sat 4/4/2026) [2:00PM CDT]

If we’re going to win a chip, we’ll have to win series against really good teams. Some of you act like you just want a title gifted to us in a cakewalk.

Fuck that. Give me all the toughest playoff matches. To be the best, you have to beat the best.

Give me a GSW-DEN-OKC-BOS… the last 4 NBA champs. It would be an all-time Playoff Run. I’m not afraid, I believe in this team.
Darn, I'll take that path. Whether you're a player or a fan, that would be 1000 times more satisfying than taking an easier route and avoiding teams. Give me the Warriors in round 1. Screw it, you've convinced me. This is the way.

I've never really been one to avoid matchups. 2007, I wasn't looking to avoid Dallas, it's just that they got knocked out beforehand, so not really the Spurs' fault.
 
Last edited:
Darn, I'll take that path. Whether you're a player or a fan, that would be 1000 times more satisfying that taking an easier route and avoiding teams. Give me the Warriors in round 1.
On the other hand, how many potential championships have we lost because we had the most difficult path?
Idk why everyone is concerned with facing Denver in the playoffs. Okc is a superior team and if we wanna chip we have to go thru them regardless. No reason to be afraid. Our guys need the experience no matter what happens
Because playing OKC after the Nuggets would be way more difficult than playing OKC after they play the Nuggets.
They'll have two warmup series, tbh.
 
On the other hand, how many potential championships have we lost because we had the most difficult path?
I mean, that holds true too, but I always think back to Lebron and all those shitty finals he made in the East. I believe what the Spurs did was superior in a more stacked conference. Spurs didn't get those easy paths. I have almost zero respect for Lebron and that record he amassed in the eastern conference. Duncan should be considered way more highly than he is by the average fan or analyst.
I really do wonder how many finals the Spurs would have made and WON if they were in the East instead. It would have been way more won that what Lebron got, that is for sure IMO.

Because playing OKC after the Nuggets would be way more difficult than playing OKC after they play the Nuggets.
They'll have two warmup series, tbh.
Again, very true, but IMO Spurs will be better equipped to beat OKC if they defeat Denver beforehand.
You can make a case for either way. One thing that sucks is that I freaking hate OKC, but I actually like Denver. That's probably the only reason I don't like to play Denver in round 2 because I like them.
 
I mean, that holds true too, but I always think back to Lebron and all those shitty finals he made in the East. I believe what the Spurs did was superior is a more stacked conference. Spurs didn't get those easy paths. I have almost zero respect for Lebron and that record he amassed in the eastern conference. Duncan should be considered way more highly than he is by the average fan or analyst.
Doesn't really matter, we don't need to have the most difficult path possible if we're to win it all.
I just want a shot at OKC since we match up against them so well. I'd rather be the 4th than 2nd seed if we have to play Denver in the second round, tbh.
 
Why do you want to avoid Denver so much? You think the team will lose to them, or do you think they'll take too much out of them even if they win the series?
 
Why do you want to avoid Denver so much? You think the team will lose to them, or do you think they'll take too much out of them even if they win the series?
Haven't I just said it?
Difference in playing OKC after the Nuggets and playing them after they play the Nuggets would be huge. If we even beat the Nuggets.
Not even having a shot at OKC after going 4-1 against them in the regular season would be disappointing.
 
Because playing OKC after the Nuggets would be way more difficult than playing OKC after they play the Nuggets.
They'll have two warmup series, tbh.
Yeah I don't see why this is hard to see. It's why the Lakers won 5 titles in the 80s while the Celtics only won 3. The Celtics were every bit as good but they were having to battle Philly, Milwaukee, and Detroit every year while the Lakers would skate through soft teams like the Spurs, Sonics, Nuggets, Warriors, Suns, etc and basically have a free ticket to the Finals every year (and still blew it twice to Rockets teams the Celtics curbstomped).
 
Haven't I just said it?
Difference in playing OKC after the Nuggets and playing them after they play the Nuggets would be huge. If we even beat the Nuggets.
Not even having a shot at OKC after going 4-1 against them in the regular season would be disappointing.
I don’t need DEN to tenderize OKC for us in R2, and if we can’t beat DEN in R2 then we didn’t earn a shot at OKC.

I don’t care who we play. We control our own destiny.
 
Yeah not a good a sign. He won't be going 17-18 from FT line every game against Denver. Going mano a mano with Jokic who is used to playing 40 minutes won't be an easy task for a perennially load-managed Wemby..

That's my biggest concern with Wembanyama and by extension the Spurs in the playoffs. Not the inexperience or 3-point shooting (media acts like they're the Pistons or Rockets in this regard).

WCQF should be fine, between about a week off entering, multi day breaks early in the round, the caliber of the Clippers/Suns and his individual matchups with them. But if/when they get to the WCSF vs the Nuggets, from game 2 on, can he hold up going every other day, playing with max intesntiy for 36-40 mpg while primarily defending Jokic?
 
If we’re going to win a chip, we’ll have to win series against really good teams. Some of you act like you just want a title gifted to us in a cakewalk.

Fuck that. Give me all the toughest playoff matches. To be the best, you have to beat the best.

Give me a GSW-DEN-OKC-BOS… the last 4 NBA champs. It would be an all-time Playoff Run. I’m not afraid, I believe in this team.
The title often ends up going to whichever contender can stay healthy, and less games needed to advance means a better chance of that. So no I'm not rooting for the hardest path. If the Spurs win the 2026 title there won't be an asterisk *played Blazers in the first or *SGA got hurt if somehow the breaks give the team an easier than expected path to the top of the mountain.
 
I don’t mind the hardest path. But I also don’t expect the Spurs to win the title this season. I think that’s too big of an ask of a team consisting of mainly playoff neophytes. IMO the Spurs are playing with house money so give them the hardest path and the most experience possible so they can build on that next year.
 
I don’t mind the hardest path. But I also don’t expect the Spurs to win the title this season. I think that’s too big of an ask of a team consisting of mainly playoff neophytes. IMO the Spurs are playing with house money so give them the hardest path and the most experience possible so they can build on that next year.
Tbh. I think we all need to temper our expectations a bit. The media/fans talk about them as if it's championship or bust. These playoffs should be a learning experience for the team, coach included. tbh
 
Well, I'm all-in. I believe the Spurs can win it all, so my expectations are very, very high. If some of you don't think they can, fair enough as you have very valid opinions. I just believe they have what it takes. Things have to go right, but they got the talent and will to do it. Whether or not it happens or not, should be a great playoffs.
 
Wemby’s the MVP imo, no question. Joker is still the best player in the world, and has been for the last 6 years or so. Wemby needs to beat him in the playoffs to get that moniker. With half a game behind the lakers, with Aaron Gordon finally back, and with lakers missing reeves and Luka, this is likely our second round matchup.
 
Honestly not too worried about Denver after yesterdays game. We really didn't play well and controlled the game 90% of the time. Great loss, rather lose @ Denver and get a game plan going into the playoffs. We definitely should sit Wemby the last game of the season if it does not ruin his 65 games played. No need to have him play, we already know what we have to do.

No team outside of OKC really bothers me because they have homecourt but one game at a time, let alone series.

Either way we're playing with house money, everyone thought we were a play-in team this year, doesn't matter what happens.

Cheers boys
 
Idk why everyone is concerned with facing Denver in the playoffs. Okc is a superior team and if we wanna chip we have to go thru them regardless. No reason to be afraid. Our guys need the experience no matter what happens
to be afraid no. but to avoid difficult matchups always increase your chances, that's how it works. but with doncic and reaves injuries, it seems impossible anyway that LA would have stayed ahead denver even if we had won that game...

but this game showed that we can compete with them. i don't know if we would be the favorite considering the experience factor, but we should be able to compete.
 
View attachment 1539

Jokic played 4:25 minutes more than Wemby.
Wemby will surely play more than 35 regulation minutes in the playoff and we win the game, tbh.
I was out of town so not posting but i caught the game. I get that fox wound up playing poorly down the stretch but im not understanding the narrative here that Harper was the hot hand. I thought his ball security seemed a bit shaky and he wasn’t particularly impactful.
 
Back
Top