This can’t be stated enough. The league wants games to be competitive. Everything about our modern defense is built around offensive freedom.Modern NBA, the game's never over. But we seriously have got to talk about these third quarters....
Point differential by quarter this season:
1st: +90
2nd: +13
3rd: -60
4th: +52
The Mitch Effect
It'd be interesting to know how he looks at it.I wonder if Wemby’s watching this and thinking “I’ll stop this 3Q meltdown shit from happening” or “Damn, sometimes our defense really sucks when I’m not out there covering up mistakes”
I think in todays basketball of at some point each team is down 15 - 20 and comes back to make it a 1 to 5 point game...just getting a win is all that matters. Only team immune to this is OKC and they are on a maniacal run to try and out do the 72 win bulls.I think this is the best take in the thread. Nicely done.
I will say though that there is reason to believe the Spurs would have been more consistent than they’ve shown so far. I’m frustrated by the team’s lack of focus, especially in the third quarter. They have really got to get better at closing bad teams out. Their record in clutch games is saving their bacon right now, but they’re clearly not in OKC’s league yet.
Bismack replacement will be a good gauge of how serious this team is this year. A 3rd legit center is more of an all in move and I wonder if the Spurs would do that not even a full season removed from being terrible.Against both CLE and NOP, both teams at halftime realized what should be quite obvious: just attack the Spurs in the paint. We need Wemby back asap, and a Bismack replacement wouldn't hurt either.
That’s surprising. With 23 games in hand, that averages out to -2.6 per game. I would’ve thought it was closer to like -10 per game (-230), and that’s not exaggerating.
Against both CLE and NOP, both teams at halftime realized what should be quite obvious: just attack the Spurs in the paint. We need Wemby back asap, and a Bismack replacement wouldn't hurt either.