I don't wanna get rid of Castle ... just stating the obvious that Harper will be the better playerI’ll argue they’re a perfect pair. Harper to run the offense and make things happen, castle to provide the grit, defense, and cutting. What a future at the backcourt we have!
Give it time lol.This is kinda weird. I don't know what to complain about right now, tbh.
Kornet is a huge reason whySomething I haven’t seen mentioned much to start the season… but Wemby (and the team in general) been a lot stronger on the glass to start the year. Wemby leading the league in rebounds isn’t out of the question.
That’s insane..Wemby's 1st turnover of the season
we have not played against worldbeaters so far ...The Spurs doing this without an athletic, switchable 6’8+ PF that baselinebums have been saying will solve a lot of the team’s “problems”…tbh
you get rid of barnes, pretty much.It's gonna be really tough to figure out a rotation when Fox and Sochan get back. Like sure, with the way the NBA is, guys will have down games and need others to step up. But all three of the main healthy guards are playing well, and you have to add an All-Star to that group. You don't even get the relief of being able to play Vassell and Castle at SF big minutes, because Johnson and Champagnie are also playing well. Do the Spurs have 11 NBA players now? I'm not even counting Olynyk in that scenario, and he may still be in the playoff rotation if the team gets there.
Imagine we an Aaron Gordon, we probably going to the WCFThe Spurs doing this without an athletic, switchable 6’8+ PF that baselinebums have been saying will solve a lot of the team’s “problems”…tbh
hmmm yeah neither is much of a triple shooter so far, so we are clearly "learnable".I’ll argue they’re a perfect pair. Harper to run the offense and make things happen, castle to provide the grit, defense, and cutting. What a future at the backcourt we have!