drpill
Not a real doctor
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2025
- Messages
- 94
- Reaction score
- 54
To be the best, you've got to beat the best... Given that the Spurs and the defending NBA champions are the only two undefeated teams remaining in the west, I thought it might be interesting to take a look at the stat sheet and see what it might reveal about how the two teams compare otherwise. I'm not an advanced stats guy so this is a pretty basic approach -- I absolutely encourage any of the statheads here to run with this and do a better analysis, I'd be curious to see what else we can learn. And yes, this is early and a small sample size, perhaps it doesn't mean all that much. Both teams have also been missing key players so things will be in flux. But I still think it's interesting and maybe this is a thread that could be updated throughout the season to see where we stack up against those guys.
What do we notice here? Interestingly, the two teams seem quite similar statistically. Both have averaged 121 points through four games (the 127 number for OKC in the bottom table is incorrect). San Antonio's defensive rating is substantially better, but they haven't played anyone as good as Houston or Indiana, so it's hard to draw solid conclusions after only four games. In terms of counting stats, points, rebounds and assists are all eerily close. OKC has the edge in steals but the Spurs are killing them in blocks (duh). Neither team is scorching from the 3 point line but surprisingly the Spurs are doing better and OKC looks like they're really struggling thus far. You have to expect the Thunder's numbers to improve there. Spurs have the edge in FG% but are destroyed at the free throw line. That is a substantial difference that could easily decide the outcome in a game or series between two closely matched teams. San Antonio is, interestingly, taking four more FTA per game (31.5 vs 27), so the end result of FTs made ends up being pretty close.
Individually, both teams have an MVP caliber player dominating the stat sheet -- both SGA and Wemby lead their team in four categories. How the hell does Holmgren not have more blocks than SGA though?
So, what do you think? Can we hang with them? Can we beat them? Obviously individual matchups are their own matter. Maybe folks have some thoughts there.
What do we notice here? Interestingly, the two teams seem quite similar statistically. Both have averaged 121 points through four games (the 127 number for OKC in the bottom table is incorrect). San Antonio's defensive rating is substantially better, but they haven't played anyone as good as Houston or Indiana, so it's hard to draw solid conclusions after only four games. In terms of counting stats, points, rebounds and assists are all eerily close. OKC has the edge in steals but the Spurs are killing them in blocks (duh). Neither team is scorching from the 3 point line but surprisingly the Spurs are doing better and OKC looks like they're really struggling thus far. You have to expect the Thunder's numbers to improve there. Spurs have the edge in FG% but are destroyed at the free throw line. That is a substantial difference that could easily decide the outcome in a game or series between two closely matched teams. San Antonio is, interestingly, taking four more FTA per game (31.5 vs 27), so the end result of FTs made ends up being pretty close.
Individually, both teams have an MVP caliber player dominating the stat sheet -- both SGA and Wemby lead their team in four categories. How the hell does Holmgren not have more blocks than SGA though?

So, what do you think? Can we hang with them? Can we beat them? Obviously individual matchups are their own matter. Maybe folks have some thoughts there.