spursparker9
Spurs fan since 2003
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2025
- Messages
- 2,687
- Reaction score
- 991
On the other hand…id have just preferred if the spurs had kept sochan???
Unless, as some have mentioned…maybe spurs were just doing sochan a solid?
Yea, Mitch has said in interview that they decided that it was best for Sochan to be released so that he can join another team and get playing time as this is his contract year. He is not in Mitch's rotation and will only rot at the bench unless there are serious injuries to few players. If Spurs had kept him to end of season and playoffs, Sochan will just pile up DNPs and that will hurt his contract nego with other teams in the off-season.
Once trade deadline has passed and MATFO were unable to get any deal and returns for Sochan, it is already a 'sunk cost loss' to the organisation (as unable to get any returns like second round pick etc) and hence do Sochan a solid by releasing the young 22 years old player to try shine with other team and play for his bag.
Last edited:
