Draft March Madness Draft Watch: Spurs Prospect Tracker

LendeBron is likely out of our range, at this point. Haugh and Lopez perhaps are too, although one of them could fall (more likely Haugh than Lopez). I think Peat is still very much in play, as is Cenac. And if worst comes to worst, and Atlanta’s pick ends up in the 20s, we could still end up with Ngongba.

What a ridiculously deep draft.
 
Frickin' Karaban gonna go and get himself drafted by the Spurs goddammit
 
Uriel said:
LendeBron is likely out of our range, at this point. Haugh and Lopez perhaps are too, although one of them could fall (more likely Haugh than Lopez). I think Peat is still very much in play, as is Cenac. And if worst comes to worst, and Atlanta’s pick ends up in the 20s, we could still end up with Ngongba.

What a ridiculously deep draft.
Click to expand...
Considering I would take Ngongba if the Hawks pick ended up in the early teens it'd be a massive win tbh.
 
OK Computer said:
You don’t have to worry about OKC taking Yaxel, tbh. They follow the same foot steps as the Spurs when it comes to culture. It’s all in the patterns and behaviors - I know few people believe in this.
Click to expand...
We had Primo, they had Giddey. No one is perfect.
 
Exstatic said:
We had Primo, they had Giddey. No one is perfect.
Click to expand...
The team also had players like Sochan, Malaki, Blake who they thought had more talent than they did and hoped they would be long-term contributors. You can fail at gauging anything, but you can be better at it afterwards.

You can only assess what’s visible through interviews, background work, and how a player carries themselves. You’re not reading someone at a deeper level beyond that.

The point is that teams still operate with standards. If something shows up during that process that doesn’t align, they’re not going to ignore it. It’s not about perfection, it’s about reducing risk and protecting the environment they’re building.
 
OK Computer said:
The team also had players like Sochan, Malaki, Blake who they thought had more talent than they did and hoped they would be long-term contributors. You can fail at gauging anything, but you can be better at it afterwards.

You can only assess what’s visible through interviews, background work, and how a player carries themselves. You’re not reading someone at a deeper level beyond that.

The point is that teams still operate with standards. If something shows up during that process that doesn’t align, they’re not going to ignore it. It’s not about perfection, it’s about reducing risk and protecting the environment they’re building.
Click to expand...
Wasn’t arguing your point, just illustrating that there are types who can slip past your interview process, both teams.
 
ace3g said:
Lexenborg
Click to expand...
Bodies and shoves guy in back causing him to lose balance and touch the floor.
Clutch Phans: "Ankle Breaker!"

Sound like he had an excellent game tho.
I wanna see Luxemborg and Boozer match up.
 
The player who might have helped himself the most in the first 3 games might be Tarris Reed.
20.3 ppg (59%FG, 75% FT), 15 rpg, 3 apg, 2 bpg.
Most mocks have him in the 40s, but he might climb up.
What wasn't yet factored in enough is his personality.
Point is, he will win the interviews, teams that don't know him yet he will blow away.
He is such a loveable, smart, eloquent, confident person and also seems to be the best teammate you can think of.
A leader and a mentor to the younger players, they obviously love to play with him.
A good student, former all academic team, a musician playing the sax and so on.
Yes, he is a bit old school, his ceiling will always be back up role player, but you need those guys as well.
A hard working, tough and smart player, who knows his role and limitations, plays defense and gets rebounds.
And a great locker room presence. I'm sold.
 
Vienna said:
The player who might have helped himself the most in the first 3 games might be Tarris Reed.
20.3 ppg (59%FG, 75% FT), 15 rpg, 3 apg, 2 bpg.
Most mocks have him in the 40s, but he might climb up.
What wasn't yet factored in enough is his personality.
Point is, he will win the interviews, teams that don't know him yet he will blow away.
He is such a loveable, smart, eloquent, confident person and also seems to be the best teammate you can think of.
A leader and a mentor to the younger players, they obviously love to play with him.
A good student, former all academic team, a musician playing the sax and so on.
Yes, he is a bit old school, his ceiling will always be back up role player, but you need those guys as well.
A hard working, tough and smart player, who knows his role and limitations, plays defense and gets rebounds.
And a great locker room presence. I'm sold.
Click to expand...
His personality is like the anti Yaxel.
 
Failed my job today to announce the games. Wagler vs Stirtz going on right now. I doubt they’re actually going to be drafted by us. Peat and Krivas coming up shortly in 15 minutes.
 
Koa Peat with some a really poor/low-IQ shot attempt to end the half. Arizona might be in trouble, although Purdue shot the lights out from 3 that half. We'll see if they can do it again.
 
OK Computer said:
Big boi #45 is purdue’s mvp
Click to expand...
Yup Oscar Cluff. Should be noted that he's almost 25 years old though lol. 24 1/2 to be exact, and looks like he's 35 with 3 kids and mortgage. Dude's playing college hoops with a lumberjack beard and a receding hairline.
 
Purdue's best players are all old as hell for CBB actually.

- Their star Center Oscar Cluff is 24 1/2 (lol)
- Their All-American PF Trey Kaufmann-Glenn is 23 1/2
- Their All-American PG Braden Smith is about to turn 23
 
mo7888 said:
Peat or Krivas at #19, who would you take?
Click to expand...
Krivas. Immediately gives us the best Center rotation in the league imo and makes Korndog expendable in a year or two if necessary. Peat might have more long-term upside but his inability to shoot the 3 whatsoever is just so unappealing. It'd be Sochan all over again with how he'd kill spacing when he's on the floor.
 
BatManu20 said:
Krivas. Immediately gives us the best Center rotation in the league imo and makes Korndog expendable in a year or two if necessary. Peat might have more long-term upside but his inability to shoot the 3 whatsoever is just so unappealing. It'd be Sochan all over again with how he'd kill spacing when he's on the floor.
Click to expand...
It's a tough call for me. I have them in the same tier. If we go into the season without any major changes I'd go Krivas too, but it's close.
 
mo7888 said:
It's a tough call for me. I have them in the same tier. If we go into the season without any major changes I'd go Krivas too, but it's close.
Click to expand...
Fair. FWIW, I think MATFO would prob lean Peat if it came down to it.
 
Another nice block by Krivas.

Edit*: And then he commits b2b dumb fouls on the next 2 possessions smh. They can't afford him getting in foul trouble.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

scott
GRADES: 11/14/2025 Spurs 108 - Warriors 109
Replies
5
Views
348
Em-City
Em-City
Back
Top