During the 2014-2015 NBA season, the Phoenix Suns decided to experiment with a three point guard lineup featuring Isaiah Thomas, Goran Dragic, and Eric Bledsoe. Isaiah Thomas was a speedy scorer who penetrated the paint frequently due to his questionable perimeter jump shot. Goran Dragic was a cerebral facilitator and outsmarted defenders more athletic than him. And Eric Bledsoe was a physical specimen that made his mark on the defensive end.
Initially, this experiment was fruitful, at least on offense. Opponents would struggle to stop multiple playmakers on both the weak and strong side. A top 7 pace led a top 2 offensive rating, but as expected, it also led to the 29th ranked defense. Chemistry issues stemming from having to share the ball forced management to split up the trio. Looking back at this other small ball experiments, I ask, are these archetypes similar enough to Fox, Harper, and Castle?
I’m not advocating for or against a three point guard lineup. The conclusion of a historical trial is not intended to be accepted as fact, but there is some correlation-causation at play both for those Suns and the current Spurs. Obviously, depending on the matchup, it could be viable or vulnerable. The reason I bring up any of this at all is because in the modern position-less era, talent almost always wins out despite size or role.
If Fox, Harper, and Castle end up as three of the five most talented players on the team, then thankfully we’ll have a failed blueprint to look back on and analyze it more to see what went wrong and if anything can be done to make it work. It’s funny how the fanbase is all excited about French Vanilla and I’m sitting over here pondering the other end of the scale. Here’s to a healthy and successful 2025-2026. Go Spurs Go!
Initially, this experiment was fruitful, at least on offense. Opponents would struggle to stop multiple playmakers on both the weak and strong side. A top 7 pace led a top 2 offensive rating, but as expected, it also led to the 29th ranked defense. Chemistry issues stemming from having to share the ball forced management to split up the trio. Looking back at this other small ball experiments, I ask, are these archetypes similar enough to Fox, Harper, and Castle?
I’m not advocating for or against a three point guard lineup. The conclusion of a historical trial is not intended to be accepted as fact, but there is some correlation-causation at play both for those Suns and the current Spurs. Obviously, depending on the matchup, it could be viable or vulnerable. The reason I bring up any of this at all is because in the modern position-less era, talent almost always wins out despite size or role.
If Fox, Harper, and Castle end up as three of the five most talented players on the team, then thankfully we’ll have a failed blueprint to look back on and analyze it more to see what went wrong and if anything can be done to make it work. It’s funny how the fanbase is all excited about French Vanilla and I’m sitting over here pondering the other end of the scale. Here’s to a healthy and successful 2025-2026. Go Spurs Go!